[w3m-dev-en 00256] Re: bug in ':' function?

From: Norman Walsh (ndw@nwalsh.com)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 06:53:56 CDT

  • Next message: Adam M. Costello: "[w3m-dev-en 00257] Re: bug in ':' function?"

    / Peter Poeml <poeml@suse.de> was heard to say:
    | According to rfc1738 (http://www.landfield.com/rfcs/rfc1738.html)
    | the semicolon is a valid character in certain contents: in ftp URLs, and
    | in prospero URLs (Prospero Directory Service).
    |
    | In http URLs it is claimed to be "reserved" -- whatever that means.

    RFC 1738 has been replaced by RFC 2396 which describes the semicolon
    character in section 3.3:

       The path may consist of a sequence of path segments separated by a
       single slash "/" character. Within a path segment, the characters
       "/", ";", "=", and "?" are reserved. Each path segment may include a
       sequence of parameters, indicated by the semicolon ";" character.
       The parameters are not significant to the parsing of relative

    | This leads me to saying that the URL you quoted is not correct.

    Nope, by my reading of 2396, it's just fine and the ':' function
    should include the reserved characters in URLs.

    -- 
    Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Always do one thing less than you think
    http://nwalsh.com/            | you can do.--Bernard Baruch
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 24 2000 - 07:16:24 CDT